Pennsylvania Department of Education

 






PDE Logo

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Department of Education
333 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17126-0333







Special Education Report
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
(Last Approved: Monday, June 23, 2008)

Entity: South Fayette Township SD
Address: 3680 Old Oakdale Rd
Mc Donald, PA 15057-2580


School District Demographics

School District

IU #

Superintendent

# of Bldgs

Total Enrollment

Total Unduplicated SES Students

South Fayette Township SD

Allegheny IU 3

Dr. Linda Hippert

3

1994

181


District Special Education Contact:

Name

Title

Phone

Fax

Email

Dr. Nanci Sullivan

Director of Pupil Personnel

412-221-4542

724-693-0110

sullivan@southfayette.org

Special Education Plan Team Members

Name

Affiliation

Membership Category

Appointed By

Al Sossi

South Fayette

Parent

Superintendent

Amy Dunn

South Fayette

Parent

Superintendent

Charissa Kinzler

South Fayette

Special Education Teacher

Superintendent

Cheryl Truman

South Fayette

Parent

Superintendent

Deborah Kuntz

South Fayette

Special Education Teacher

Superintendent

Elaine Fox-Schafer

South Fayette

Parent

Superintendent

Gretchen Tucci

South Fayette

Administrator

Superintendent

Jennifer Fuller

South Fayette

Parent

Superintendent

Jennifer Iagnemma

South Fayette

Parent

Superintendent

Julie Terling

South Fayette

Parent

Superintendent

Laurie Gray

South Fayette

Administrator

Superintendent

Marie DeAngelis

South Fayette

Regular Education Teacher

Superintendent

Melissa Parks

South Fayette

Parent

Superintendent

Nanci Sullivan

South Fayette

Administrator

Superintendent

Nick Fratto

South Fayette

Parent

Superintendent

Program Evaluation (P.L. 105-17, §612(2) and §613(a))

Current Program Strengths and Highlights

The South Fayette School District has an efficient child find system to locate, identify, and evaluate school-aged children who are thought-to-be eligible for special education and related services.  The district employs various mechanisms to ensure public awareness of our child find activities.  For example, each year the Annual Public and Parental Information Notice is included in a local community magazine that is distributed to every household in the district.  In addition, the Annual Public and Parental Information Notice is  available on the South Fayette School District website under the Pupil Personnel link.  Contact information is included on the website for questions and concerns that may arise regarding "child find". 

The South Fayette School District is committed to setting high standards for all exceptional students in the school district receiving special education services.   Special education supports and services in the South Fayette School District include a full continuum of services (approved private school placement to full inclusion based on each student's individual needs) and are in compliance with federal and state laws.  Additional resources are utilized outside of the district including the Allegheny Intermediate Unit #3, local approved private schools, private schools, FamilyLinks, Turtle Creek D/A, Outreach Teen and Family Services and PaTTAN. 

Programs are available in the South Fayette School District for students with the following disabilities:  learning disabled, autism spectrum disorders, Deafness/Hearing Impaired, serious emotional disturbance, mental retardation, muliple disabilities, orthopedic impairment, other health impaired, speech and language impairment, traumatic brain injury, and visual impairment including blindness, down syndrome and atypical syndromes, etc.  Related services are available to assist a student with a disability that necessitates:  specialized transportation, adaptive physical education, speech and language support, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orientation and mobility therapy, social worker services and psychological services.  If a student who has a disability exhibits a pattern of behaviors through functional behavioral assessments and it is impeding their learning, a positive behavior intervention plan will be developed for the student through the IEP Team process.  Students with an identifiable disability which limits or prohibits participation in or access to an aspect of the school program can be provided with modifications and adaptations through a Chapter 15 504 Service agreement.

South Fayette School District has 21 paraeducators in grades K-12 to serve as supports to students who are identified as having a disability in both regular education and special education settings.  All of our paraeducators and special education teachers are considered "highly qualified".  There has been extensive professional development in the area of special education services, disabilities, programming, research evidenced-based strategies and interventions, special education paperwork guidelines, etc. for special education teachers, paraeducators, speech and language therapist, guidance counselors, school psychologist and the director of pupil personnel. 

One of the district's high school paraeducators has facilitated a group for both regular education and special education students called "Circle of Friends".   Circle of Friends is a club that encourages and fosters friendships and acceptance/understanding between students in the mainstream and their peers with special needs from the lifeskills classroom.  They meet once or twice a month after school (sometimes more depending on the activity going on). Some of their activities include volunteering at the Down Syndrome Buddy Walk in the fall, planning a Mardi Gras Dance for area students with special needs, and coordinating the SF District Wide Penny Challenge.  At their meetings, they also play board games, wiffle ball, basketball, have holiday parties and have occasionally gotten together to see a movie outside of school.  Some members also volunteer at monthly local dances for young people with special needs.

Also, the 21 paraeducators in our district with one paraeducator facilitating it has created a "County-wide Professional Development Day for Paraeducators".  They now meet annually in October.  They have a theme each year for the day and they have four speakers who present on topics such as special education law, autism spectrum disorders, etc.  Many of the area districts in Allegheny County send their paraeducators to this professional development day in our district.  Lunch is provided and prizes awarded.  There have been many positive comments made that our paraeducators take their time to make this day very informational and beneficial for all paraeducators in the county!

Both the elementary and the middle schools are in the process of discussing and attending conferences, workshops and in-services on the "Response-to-Intervention" model.  The elementary has changed their basal reading series to Harcourt Trophies which is considered Tier I of RtI.  The elementary has trained reading specialists from the Reading Achievement Center/Allegheny Intermediate Unit #3 implemented an intensive reading program with small groups of six children in a group to focus on reading for 2.5 hours per day.  In these reading groups, the reading specialists are addressing the five component of reading instruction such as phonemic awareness, decoding, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension. This program was designed as the Tier II of the RtI model.

The middle school principal and IST teacher have attended some in-services, workshops or conferences on RtI at the secondary level.  They are discussing different methodologies related to the tier system of RtI with the school psychologist and the director of pupil personnel.  They have implemented a pilot for the Tier II component of RtI with their recently hired reading specialist with a curriculum entitled, "Language!".  The middle school will continue to develop an appropriate RtI framework that will meet the needs of their students in grades 5-8.

At the elementary school (K-4), a child study team has been established as part of the pre-referral intervention process.  The team consists of principals, guidance counselor, regular education teachers, reading specialists, school psychologist when needed and special education staff when needed.  Parents are also part of this process and are contacted and strongly encouraged to participate in all phases of the child study team process.  The Child Study Team assists teachers and parents with supporting students who are experiencing academic, behavioral, medical, emotional and social skills difficulties.

In the middle school, an "Instructional Support Team (IST)" model is utilized as part of the pre-referral intervention process.  The middle school has an IST teacher who coordinates and oversees the IST pre-referral process.  She coordinates all meetings between parents and staff and identifies researched evidenced-based strategies that can be implemented in the regular education classroom setting for students who are at-risk.  She assists the IST Team with developing appropriate academic goals that the students need to achieve in order to succeed academically in the regular classroom setting.  The IST teacher also monitors the effectiveness of the instructional strategies that are utilized in the regular classroom environment.   She also works with students on study skills, organizational skills, preparedness, etc.  She will on occasion provide individual or small group tutoring sessions on focused areas of need. 

The South Fayette Student Assistance Team (SAP) is an additional support used by the district to identify at-risk students.  SAP team are currently in place at the middle and high school levels.  SAP is a cooperative effort with parents in utilizing the support staff, students, and community through contracted services with FamilyLinks and Turtle Creek.  It is a proactive prevention/intervention program that attempts to provide intervention before school performance is seriously compromised.  The SAP Core Team of individuals are trained in the SAP Model and focus on screening/intervention for student who may be experiencing drug and alcohol, depression, and/or family issues, referrals to appropriate agencies or treatment facilities, aftercare for those returning from treatment, and crisis intervention as needed.

The district offers the continuum of services to students identified with emotional needs.  For example, all students identified with emotional disturbance have individual behavior support plans developed and implemented as part of their IEP.  If small group and/or individual academic instruction is needed, students may receive instruction within a learning support classroom or core academic subject areas.  Special education teachers, regular education teaching staff, and paraeducators work collaboratively to implement all components of the IEP including goals/objectives and behavior support plans.  The district has also entered into a consultation agreement with The Watson Institute so that their clinical experts can provide in-service, guidance, and technical support to the students, teaching staff, administrators, and parents regarding the needs of students diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders.  This ensures that all parties responsible for providing services to the student have the skills necessary to address student needs in the LRE.  In addition, Allegheny Intermediate Unit behavior specialists are consulted on a regular basis to provide assistance with difficult or unique emotional/behavioral cases.  Lastly, we have AIU contracted social workers who provide one-on-one counseling and Social Skills Groups.  They also conduct Functional Behavior Assessments and Social Histories.

Students receiving special education services in Approved Private Schools or full-time emotional support facilities are reintegrated back to the district to the extent possible in a manner that meets their individual needs.  For example, a student attending Holy Family Learning Day School may attend South Fayette High School for 1 or 2 subjects for a period of time in an effort to ensure a seamless and successful transition back to the lesser restrictive setting of the public school.  IEP team members from both schools collaborate in order to customize the student's schedule and to ensure necessary supports are in place.  Also, students attending full-time placements may attend the vocational-technical school as their needs and interest warrant. 

Another strength in the district's special education program is found in our relationship with the Allegheny Intermediate Unit's related service providers who provide services to South Fayette School District students.  The district provides through a contract with the AIU, social work services, assistive technology, speech and language support, vision support, deaf-hearing support, occupational therapy, and physical therapy to students as indicated via the IEP.  These related service providers are a valuable asset and support to the students, staff, and administrators in the district.

The district has purchased an alternative curriculum (i.e. Reading Mastery, SRA Corrective Reading, Connecting Math, Reasoning & Writing and Morophograph Spelling) for those students who require intense reading, math and writing instruction.  Extensive training with frequent follow-up has been provided to the special education staff in order to correctly and effectively institute the program.  AYP and APM (annual progress monitoring) data, which is collected on a regular and individual basis, as well as individual and group achievement test scores all have shown that the program is significantly improving our student's reading skills, math and writing skills.

The greatest strength of the South Fayette special education program is the teaching staff who provide the services and support for our students with disabilities.  District-wide, our special education teaching staff demonstrates a strong work ethic, professionalism, and commitment to meeting the needs of students under their care.  The teaching staff exhibits a willingness to learn and incorporate new strategies to meet individual student needs as well as diligence and responsibility in keeping up with the necessary special education paperwork/processes.  The special education and regular education teachers work collaboratively to ensure that each student with a disability needs are met in the least restrictive environment.  IEPs are developed based on present education levels and needs as listed in the Evaluation Report.  The district has a special education program in place in all buildings in order to address student needs in their neighborhood school to the maximum extent possible to ensure a least restrictive environment for all students with special needs.  Goals and objectives are developed to meet the individual needs of students and are aligned with the general education curriculum and state standards in reading and mathematics in order to ensure a focus on critical skill development.


Highlights of Supporting Students with Special Needs:

  • Guidance Review by Pennsylvania Pupil Services Association and Creation of a 3 year Action Plan
  • Special Education Team Leaders in each Building/Monthly meetings with the Director
  • Restructured Social Worker Services/Parent Resource Binder/Social Skills Groups/Individual Counsel
  • Reorganization — Duties/Roles/Expectations of Staff.
  • Polaris Suite— Special Education Document Software Program
  • Adoption Research evidence-based Alternative Reading and Math Curriculum (Reading, Math and Writing). (Reading Mastery, Corrective Reading
              Connecting Math).
  • Currently Writing the Special Education Alternative Curriculum in Grades K-12 to align with the PA Eligible Content/Anchors.
  • Created an Elective Course Entitled “Career Pathways” for Credit in LS for Grades 11-12.
  • Extensive Staff Development (Autism Spectrum Disorder, Functional Behavioral Assessments, Writing Measurable Goals and Objectives,
              Transition Services, etc.).
  • Collection of Extended School Year Data 4x per year.
  • Purchase of two Evacu-tracs and training for all teachers and principals in the elementary and middle schools to learn to use the Evacu-trac for students with physical disabilities
  • PIAT-R Testing — consistency among staff to monitor individual student progress.
  • No Due Process Hearings.
  • 17 Successful Mediation Hearings (2001-2008)
  • Central Location of Special Education Department Students Records.
  • Beginning  of the Year and End of the Year Checklists for Special Education Teachers
  • End of the Year File Checklist for all special education records annually
  • Provide Appropriate Placements in LRE.
  • Networking with SDs, APS, Private Schools, AIU, Outside Agencies, Related Services.
  • Exited 4 students from Special Education over the past 5 years.
  • Matched IEP Goals to PA State Eligible Content/Anchors.
  • Writing mini-lessons for learning support programs on targeted PA Academic Standards
  • Paraeducator Competency Training Program — Initiation on June 2005-June 2008 .
  • ParaPro Test for Paraeducators implemented through the AIU NCLB/IDEIA  HQ
  • Adoption of 7 Board Policies, including new Classroom Visitation Policy.
  • Administrative Procedures for BSC and TSS Outside Agencies.
  • Annual Data Collection for tracking— Social Worker Services, Family Links, Guidance Counselors, Psychological Services and IST Services.
  • Created Pupil Personnel/Special Education Website.
  • Guidance Counselor Websites.
  • School Nurses Website.
  • Created a Parent Resource Binder for Special Education.
  • Created a Transition Resources packet for Parents of High Special Education students.
  • Groups (i.e. Social Skills, Changing Families, etc.) in the learning support classroom through FamilyLinks and social workers.
  • Annual Progress Monitoring in Reading and Writing for all Learning Support Students using Chartdog.
  • Annual Pupil Personnel/Special Education Team Building Activity
  • Annual Special Education Parent Training/Meeting
  • “Why Try Program” for Behavior and Social Skills (Kits to be utilized for guidance counselors, social workers, etc.)
  • Speaker on Differentiated Instruction (Coudersport, PA)
  • After-School Tutoring Program:  REWARDS, Word Building and the Administration of the San Diego Quick Assessment
  • Conducted 3 meetings in each building with the entire staff on children and families who are considered “Homeless/Temporarily Displaced-2008.
  • Created Brochures to have in all main offices and posted them on the district's website under "pupil services" regarding services available for students and families who are considered “Homeless/Temporarily Displaced-2008.
  • Implemented a first grade program entitled, "Rainbow Fish" to learn about tolerance and differences of others

Identifying Students with Learning Disabilities

The district will continue to use a discrepancy model that examines whether a child exhibits a pattern of strengths and weaknesses, relative to intellectual ability as defined by a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement, or relative to age or grade.  The district is in the process of implementing a regular education Response-to-Intervention Model (RtI) with a three tier system at the elementary and middle school levels and the district will continue to work on all aspects of RtI.  Staff and administration have attended in-services regarding the RtI Model. 

The elementary school as part of Tier I of RtI had all of our regular classroom teachers trained extensively by our reading specialists on research-evidenced based reading strategies from the Reading Achievement Center.  Classroom teachers are incorporating the following activities/strategies into their daily instruction: phonemic awareness activities, decoding activities (word building and syllasearch), vocabulary development of rich vocabulary, fluency instruction, and comprehension strategies.  All of the instruction is explicit and systematic.  Teachers give struggling students individual attention and increase the amount of instruction in these areas.  

Also at the elementary, Tier II of our RTI model is the Kindergarten Express classrooms in kindergarten and the Reading Achievement classrooms in first through fourth grade.  These classrooms provide intensive reading instruction for students that are considered below basic or basic.   Our reading specialists have received intensive instruction on the reading process and have been trained to provide explicit and systematic instruction.  Research-evidence based instruction include phonemic awareness activities, word building, syllasearch, developing vocabulary through Isabel Beck’s model of robust vocabulary instruction, Questioning the Author strategy, Text Talk strategy, chunking text, "What are you thinking?" strategy, scrolling, character mapping, and color coding text.

Kindergarten children are screened using the Early Screening Profile from American Guidance Service during our kindergarten registration.  Students identified as lacking readiness skills are placed in the Kindergarten Express classroom for half a day and the regular kindergarten classroom the other half.  The Kindergarten Express classroom has fifteen AM students and fifteen PM students.  Students receive intensive instruction with a reading specialist and paraeducator.  Instruction includes activities focusing on phonemic awareness, letter recognition and sounds, decoding (word building), sight word recognition, reading decodable text, and comprehension.     

All first grade through fourth grade students are assessed using the assessments from the Reading Achievement Center at the beginning of each school year.  Students are assessed on sight word recognition, decoding pseudo words, fluency, and comprehension.  Students scoring below basic are placed in the Reading Achievement classroom at the beginning of the school year.  Students scoring basic are either placed in the Reading Achievement classroom or monitored in the regular reading classroom.  Placement of these students is determined by the degree of reading deficiency.  Basic students not placed in the Reading Achievement classroom are monitored closely with reading strategies implemented in the regular reading classroom.  If these students do not progress, they will be placed in the Reading Achievement classroom for intensive reading instruction.  Each Reading Achievement classroom contains eighteen students.    

The Reading Achievement classrooms in first grade through fourth grade provide intensive small group instruction for the entire language arts block.  Students rotate in groups of six among a reading specialist, classroom teacher, and a paraeducator in first and second grade.  Students in third and fourth grade also rotate in groups of six among a reading specialist and a classroom teacher.  Students are provided intensive instruction in phonemic awareness, decoding (word building and syllasearch), vocabulary development, fluency, and comprehension strategies.  Students are given numerous opportunities to apply these reading strategies to reading various types of text.  Materials used in these classrooms were developed by Harcourt Trophies, Reading Achievement Center, Isabel Beck, Rebecca Hamilton, and our reading specialists.  Students are routinely assessed on decoding, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension to monitor their progress.          

At the middle school, the instructional support teacher has made a presentation with school psychologist on the components of RtI.  Tier I is regular classroom effective instructional strategies/adaptations that are implemented for students who are considered to be in academic or behavioral need.  Services of the instructional support teacher are used to assist the classroom teacher to identify at-risk students and appropriate strategies to meet their needs. The middle school also has made changes by implementing the "Language!" program that is research-evidence based as Tier II of RtI.  Also, at this level the middle school specialist oversees and implements the "Language!" program which focuses on decoding skills, fluency and comprehension.  The middle school for 2008-2009 will implement an additional research-evidence based reading intervention entitled, "Read Naturally".

At the elementary and middle schools, Tier III as part of the RtI process is considered special education where Reading Mastery, SRA Corrective Reading, word building strategy, syllasearch strategy and annual progressing monitoring for reading fluency (Read Naturally) and writing are implemented.  Also, special education teachers are able to chunk material for understanding, monitor and adjust the instruction to the individual's instructional levels, provide frequent repetition of concepts and new information and allows additional time for the student to process information.  The learning support classrooms also utilized the research-evidence based SRA math program entitled, "Connecting Math".

At the high school level, the Student Assistance Team (SAP), identifies students who are at-risk academically or behaviorally and who may be in need of a multidisciplinary team evaluation.  The South Fayette High School has after school tutoring sessions on Wednesdays with certified teachers to help support students in any academic area.  Also, the guidance department held a study skills group for 2007-2008 and the social workers also address study skills in individual sessions with students.

If a student continues to have difficulties academically or behaviorally despite the child receiving interventions in the regular classroom setting and through the reading rooms at the elementary or the middle school Tiers I and II, then the child is referred for to the school psychologist for a multidisciplinary team evaluation.  The parents also have the right at any time to have child evaluated by the school psychologist.  The district currently uses a pre-referral Child Study Model at the elementary, at the middle school the district uses Instructional Support Team (IST), and a SAP model at the secondary level for at-risk students.  The district posts the "Child Find Notice" publicly on the district's homepage website under the pupil personnel link and it has contact information for the special education department if parents would have any concern or questions.  Also, the district posts annually the "Child Find Notice" in a local community magazine that goes to every taxpayer household in the district.  

Enrollment Differences

 

Not significantly disproportionate.

Ethnicity Enrollment Differences

 

Not significantly disproportionate.

Exiting Statistics

 

Graduation rate and dropout rate have been met.

24 P.S., §1306 and §1306.2 Placements

Facilities for Nonresident Students

Facility Name

Provider of Educational Services

# of Students Receiving Srvcs as of Dec 1

None

None

0

Incarcerated Students Oversight

There are currently no correctional facilities located in the South Fayette School District.  However, the school district stays in close communication with the local South Fayette Police Department.

Upon notification that a student has been incarcerated, the South Fayette School District will automatically transmit all pertinent special education records to the facility where the students are incarcerated in order to provide a free and appropriate public education (FAPE). Also, pending the release of a student who has been incarcerated the South Fayette School District will request records from the the correctional institution in order to plan and to determine an appropriate educational placement for that student (FAPE). 

If a student is assigned a probation officer, the school district will issue a release of records that is signed by the guardians of the student giving the district permission to communicate with the probation officer during the time period that the student is incarcerated and upon their transition back to the school environment while the student is on probation.

Facilities for Incarcerated Students

Facility Name

Provider of Educational Services

# of Students Receiving Srvcs as of Dec 1

None

None

0

Least Restrictive Environment 34 CFR §300.551

Ensuring Maximum Integration

Every student in the South Fayette School District is provided an educational program that promotes independence and success as a contributing member of society upon completion of school.  In order to achieve this goal, the student is instructed in a program that has its roots within the general education curriculum with modifications and accommodations for individual special needs of that student.  The South Fayette School District is in its initial stages of the implementation of Response-to-Intervention (RtI).  At the elementary level, the district is utilizing as its Tier 1 of RtI in regular education classrooms by implementing research-evidence based strategies and using Harcourt Trophies as their basal reading program to support students who are struggling in the areas of reading and math.  The elementary for Tier II of the RtI Model is also utilizing reading specialists that have been trained at the Reading Achievement Center through the Allegheny Intermediate Unit #3.  These reading specialists have small group instruction (6 students per group), intensive (increase of frequency and duration) instruction, curriculum and strategies that are research-evidenced based with students who are demonstrating a deficiency in reading.  The district is currently utilizing the universal screening of the 4Sight Benchmarks 3x per year and at the elementary level.  Students who are receiving small group reading instruction as part of the RtI Tier II process the district is using screenings and assessments developed by the Reading Achievement Center (RAC) at the Allegheny Intermediate Unit #3.   These specialists created reading groups of no more than 6 students per group where they work intensely and frequently with students on word building strategies, reading fluency, vocabulary, phonemic awareness and comprehension.  Also at the elementary school, after school tutoring sessions are conducted for students who are at at-risk in mathematic skill areas.

At the middle school, the instructional support teacher has made a presentation with the school psychologist on the components of RtI.  Tier I is regular classroom effective instructional strategies/adaptations that are implemented for students who are considered to be in academic or behavioral need.  Services of the instructional support teacher are used to assist the classroom teacher to identify at-risk students and appropriate strategies to meet their needs. The middle school also has made changes by implementing the "Language!" program that is research-evidence based as Tier II of RtI.  Also, at this level the middle school specialist oversees and implements the "Language!" program which focuses on decoding skills, fluency and comprehension.  For 2008-2009, the middle school will implement an additional research-evidence based reading intervention entitled, "Read Naturally".

At the elementary and middle schools, Tier III as part of the RtI process is considered special education where Reading Mastery, SRA Corrective Reading, word building strategy, syllasearch strategy and annual progressing monitoring for reading fluency (Read Naturally) and writing are implemented.  Also, special education teachers are able to chunk material for understanding, monitor and adjust the instruction to the individual's instructional levels, provide frequent repetition of concepts and new information and allows additional time for the student to process information.  The learning support classrooms also utilized the research-evidence based SRA math program entitled, "Connecting Math".

At the high school level, the Student Assistance Team (SAP), identifies students who are at-risk academically or behaviorally and who may be in need of a multidisciplinary team evaluation.  The South Fayette High School has after school tutoring sessions on Wednesdays with certified teachers to help support students in any academic area.  Also, the guidance department held a study skills group for 2007-2008 and the social workers also address study skills in individual sessions with students.

If a student continues to have difficulties academically or behaviorally despite the child receiving interventions in the regular classroom setting and through the reading rooms at the elementary or the middle school Tiers I and II, then the child is referred for to the school psychologist for a multidisciplinary team evaluation.  The parents also have the right at any time to have child evaluated by the school psychologist.  The district currently uses a pre-referral Child Study Model at the elementary, at the middle school the district uses Instructional Support Team (IST), and a SAP model at the secondary level for at-risk students.  The district posts the "Child Find Notice" publicly on the district's homepage website under the pupil personnel link and it has contact information for the special education department if parents would have any concern or questions.  Also, the district posts annually the "Child Find Notice" in a local community magazine entitled, "South Fayette & Neighbors" which goes to every resident in South Fayette.

South Fayette School District also utilizes Watson Institute in having an autism spectrum disorder consultant who comes to the district twice a month.  The consultant observes students in regular education classrooms settings in grades K-12, writes a report on each observation and makes recommendations to the teachers, guidance counselors and the Director of Pupil Personnel.  The consultant also provides training to special education teachers, regular education teachers and paraeducators on the TEACCH method, making work bins, participant in IEP/BIP meetings, collecting data from functional behavioral assessments and behavior intervention plans.  By having an ASD consultant, the district is able to support many students with ASD in the least restrictive setting.

The South Fayette School District is committed to delivering its special education services for exceptional students in the least restrictive environment (LRE).  The methods  for the delivery of the curriculum from the least restrictive to the most restrictive are listed below.

1.    Regular Education
2.    Regular education with supplementary aids and services in the general education classroom
3.    Regular education with supplementary aids and services in the special education classroom
4.    Special education is using a research-based evidence curriculum specially designed for the student with a disability.  A replacement curriculum or          program is provided when the student's disability warrants a functional like skills curriculum or curricular methods, techniques for strategies for students with autism.
5.    Approved private school or private school with supplementary aids and services and related services

First, the IEP teams contemplate educational placement in the regular education classroom not only as it currently exists, but also as it might be modified through the provision of supplementary aids and services.  Next, the IEP Team would consider a student with a disability who is in need of specially designed instruction (SDI) in the South Fayette School District is supported by a Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) and an Individualized Education Program (IEP) team.  All IEP's are reviewed and/or revised at least once a year.  All student programs are reevaluated every three years per state mandates.  Those students with Mental Retardation are reevaluated every two years.

Other students with disabilities who do not quality for supports and services through special education may be provided for as a Protected Handicapped Student under the requirements of Section 504 of the Federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Chapter 15 of state regulations Title 22. Students with an identifiable disability which limits or prohibits participation in or access to an aspect of the school program can be provided with modifications and adaptations through a Chapter 15 Service Plan. Although students with disabilities may have limitations; staff, parents, and students strive to ensure that each student reaches his or her highest potential with the appropriate interventions and supports in the LRE.
 
The student's individual needs and abilities determine the type of service, type of support and the percentage of time outside the general education classroom. Supplementary aids and services and related services include, but are not limited to: audiological services, psychological services, occupational therapy, physical therapy, transportation, counseling services, school health services, speech and language services, adaptive physical therapy, orientation and mobility therapy, Behavioral Support Plans, Paraprofessionals, mental health services, and assistive technology and devices. All services and placement options are individually determined based on the students unique abilities and needs.

Placement decisions are not solely based on:
1. The category of disability
2. Significance of the disability
3. Availability of special education and related services
4. Availability of Space

Exceptional students in the South Fayette School District are provided special education services and opportunities to be instructed or participate in the general education classroom and curriculum through the service delivery model of co-teaching as well as inclusion (mainstreaming). Students are also provided special education services in small group settings. All students are are assigned a case manager who monitors the student's progress and provides support services in all settings. 

The Allegheny Intermediate Unit #3 and PaTTAN are two educational agencies that South Fayette School District utilizes for consulting and training services. Consultants from both entities provide training in various topics related to special education; such as: IDEA 2004, Response to Intervention, writing measurable goals and objectives, progress monitoring, Functional Behavioral Assessments, Behavior Support Plans, and transition services. The district also consults with local universities, agencies and private consultative services for inclusion consultations and training and paraprofessionals training.


 

Supplementary Aids and Services

Service/Resource

Description

Collaborative: Scheduled Time for Team Meetings,Instructional accommodation support such as consistent collaboration between regular classroom teachers and special education teachers, paraeducator support in the regular classroom setting, progress notices are from regular education teachers to special education teachers, provide consultation and support assistive technology, scheduled opportunities for collaboration with the parents by holding multi-dsicilinary team meetings, parent evening meetings and pre-referral process (i.e. child study team, IST and SAP) OT, PT, speech and language, orientation and mobility training.

Instructional: Modified curriculum in the regular classroom setting based on the needs of the students, regular education teachers and special education teachers provide differentiated instruction,regular and special education teachers provide alternative materials to match the learning styles of the students, special education utilize research-based supplementary materials, regular and special education teachers provide instructional adaptations such as repetition and review, re-teaching, pre-teaching, adapting tests and assignments, use of study guides and graphic organizers and use assistive technology.

Physical: Adaptive physical education classes when needed, study carrels for the students, proximity seating near the classroom teacher, preferential seating, individualized desk to isolate distractions, adaptive equipment, and technology usage.

Supports and services: social skills instruction, guidance counseling support services, peer mediatation, functional behavioral assessments, positive behavior intervention plan, cooperative learning groups.

LRE Data Analysis

 

Personnel Development Activities

Topic: Inclusionary Practices and Strategies for Regular Education: Students with disabilities will be provided supports and services by personnel with the knowledge and skills necessary to meet their needs.

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Spring 2009, 2010, 2011

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Outside private consulation, podcasts, teleconferences

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Workshops with Joint Planning Periods, Conferences, Distance Learning, Special Education Teachers Training Regular Education Teachers

South Fayette School district's data for 2005-2006 reflects:
42% of special education students outside of the regular education classroom
7% in other settings

2008-2009:
42% to a decrease of 2% (40%) of special education students outside of the regular education classroom 7% to a decrease of 1% (6%) in other settings

2009-2010:
40% to a decrease of 2% (38%) of special education students outside of the regular education classroom6% to a decrease of 1% (5%) in other settings

2010-2011: 38% to a decrease of 2% (36%) of special education students outside of the regular education classroom 5% to a decrease of 1% (4%) in other settings.

 

Topic: Inclusionary Behavioral/Social Practices and Strategies for Regular Education: Students with disabilities will be provided behavioral/social supports and services by personnel with the knowledge and skills necessary to meet their needs.

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Fall 2008, 2010, 2011

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Consultative agencies/organizations, podcasts and teleconferences

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Workshops with Joint Planning Periods, Distance Learning, Special Education Teachers Training Regular Education Teachers

South Fayette School district's data for 2005-2006 reflects:
42% of special education students outside of the regular education classroom
7% in other settings

2008-2009:
42% to a decrease of 2% (40%) of special education students outside of the regular education classroom7% to a decrease of 1% (6%) in other settings

2009-2010:
40% to a increase of 2% (38%) of special education students outside of the regular education classroom6% to a decrease of 1% (5%) in other settings

2010-2011: 38% to a decrease of 2% (36%) of special education students outside of the regular education classroom 5% to a decrease of 1% (4%) in other settings

Least Restrictive Environment - Facilities

Facility Name

Type of Facility

Type of Service

# of Students Placed

Pressley-Ridge

Approved Private Schools

Facility offers life skills support, emotional support, learning support, autistic support, mental health services, social worker services, psychiatric/psychological consultation, medication management, OT, PT, AT and speech and language services and community-based instruction.

1

Children's Institute

Approved Private Schools

Facility offers life skills support, autistic support, OT, PT, AT,speech and language, orientation and mobility training, social worker services, sensory support,adaptive physical,education, psychological services and medical/nursing services.

3

Wesley-Spectrum Highlands

Approved Private Schools

Facility offers learning support, emotional support, autistic support, life skills support, PT, OT, AT, speech and language, psychiatric/psychological services, mental health services, social worker services and community-based services.

1

Wesley-Spectrum Academy

Other

Facility offers learning and emotional support services, mental health services, counseling services and transition services

1

Watson Institute

Approved Private Schools

Facility offers life skills and autistic support with OT,PT, AT, speech and language and transition services.

1

Holy Family Institute

Other

Facility offers full-time emotional support, transition services, counseling services, psychological services and a drug and alcohol services

3

Western PA School for the Blind

Approved Private Schools

Facility provides blind and visual impairment support, orientation and mobility support, community-based services, counseling services, transition services, horticultural therapy, sensory therapy, music therapy, aquatic therapy, OT, PT, AT, adaptive physical education, speech and language and medical/nursing services

1

Keystone Oaks School District

Neighboring School Districts

School District provides middle school life skills program, speech and language services, PT, OT, AT, transitional services, psychological services and counseling services.

2

The Pathfinder School

Special Education Centers

School provides life skills support, autistic support, PT, OT, AT, speech and language, sensory integration therapy, transition services, aquatic therapy, adaptive physical education, behavior specialist consultant

3

Personnel Development for Improved Student Results

Technical Assistance and Training

 

Personnel Development Activities

Topic: AYP

There are currently no trainings entered for this topic.

 

Topic: Participation

There are currently no trainings entered for this topic.

 

Topic: Proficiency

There are currently no trainings entered for this topic.

Personnel Development - PA NCLB Goal #1

Reflections

There are currently no reflections selected for this section.

Base Line Data

Overall the results of our 2007 PSSA Scores in Grades 3 - 8 are high with 89% of the students scoring proficient in Reading and 92% of the students scoring proficient in Math.  For Writing in the 5th grade, 82% of the students scored proficient and 97% of the 8th grade score.

2006-2007  PSSA Data Results for Reading for Students with IEPs

3rd grade-6.7 Below Basic
                13.3 Basic
                40.0 Proficient
                40.0 Advanced

4th grade-31.3 Below Basic
                31.3 Basic
                12.5 Proficient
                25.0 Advanced

5th grade- 45.0 Below Basic
                 20.0 Basic
                 30.0 Proficient
                 5.0   Advanced

6th grade-40.0 Below Basic
                10.0 Basic
                20.0 Proficient
                30.0 Advanced

8th grade-45.5 Below Basic
                18.2 Basic
                27.3 Proficient
                  9.1 Advanced

11th grade-88.2 Below Basic
                  11.8 Basic

2006-2007  PSSA Data Results for Mathematics for Students with IEPs

3rd grade-13.3 Below Basic
                26.7 Proficient
                60.0 Advanced

4th grade-12.5 Below Basic
                31.3 Basic
                43.3 Proficient
                12.5 Advanced

5th grade-60.0 Below Basic 
                10.0 Basic
                  5.0 Proficient
                35.0 Advanced

6th grade-20.0 Below Basic
                10.0 Basic
                20.0 Proficient
                50.0 Advanced

8th grade-54.5 Below Basic
                36.4 Basic
                  9.1 Advanced

11th grade-82.4 Below Basic
                    5.9 Basic
                  11.8 Proficient

Personnel Development Activities

Topic: Reading

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Fall 2009, Fall 2010, Fall 2011

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Higher Education Staff, Teleconferences, webinars, consultants from outside agencies organizations

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Workshops with Joint Planning Periods, Conferences, Distance Learning, District Staff Development, Grade Level Teams, Department Team Meetings, 2-hour Delay Days

In grades 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 in reading for students with IEPs, the district's students will achieve an increase of 10% from below basic to basic and a 10% increase from basic to proficient by 2011.

In grade 11 in reading for students with IEPs, the district's students achieve an increase of 30% from below basic to basic and 20% from basic to proficient by 2011.

 

Topic: Math

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Winter 2009, Winter 2010, Winter 2011

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Higher Education Staff, Teleconferences, webinars, consultants from outside agencies organizations

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Workshops with Joint Planning Periods, Conferences, Distance Learning, District Staff Development, Grade Level Teams, Department Team Meetings, 2-hour Delay Days

In grades 3, 4, 5 and 6 in mathematics for students with IEPs, the district's students will achieve an increase of 10% from below basic to basic and a 10% increase from basic to proficient by 2011.

In grades 8 and 11 in mathematics for students with IEPs, the district's students will achieve an increase of 20% from below basic to basic and 35% from basic to proficient by 2011.

Personnel Development - PA NCLB Goal #3

Reflections

There are currently no reflections selected for this section.

Base Line Data

For the 2006-2007 school year, all of our regular and special education teachers were qualified and certified in the areas of assignment.  Special education teachers at the secondary level completed all of the requirements to be deemed highly qualified either through the Bridge or HOUSE process.  Professional staff continues to increase their knowledge and skills through ACT 48 trainings and in-service training

All of our special education paraeducators are considered high qualifed by having a 2 or 4-year degree, scoring in the appropriate test score range of the Para-Pro assessment for paraeducators from the Allegheny Intermediate Unit or they have completed the PDE Credential of Competency for Special Education Paraeducators.

There is ongoing professional staff development for regular education teachers, special education teachers and paraeducators on confidentiality, positive behavior support, research-evidence based strategies and programs for reading, updates on special education changes such as Gaskins and other various mandates that pertain to special education and the rights of children with disabilities.  We also provide training in individual exceptionalities such as Autism Spectrum Disorders, ADHD, specific learning disabilities, anxiety disorders, depression, etc.

Personnel Development Activities

Topic: AUTISM: Students with disabilities will be provided services by an adequate supply of personnel with the knowledge and skills necessary to meet their needs

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Spring 2009, Spring 2010, Spring 2011

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Higher Education Staff, Teleconferences, webinars, consultants from outside agencies organizations

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Workshops with Joint Planning Periods, Conferences, Distance Learning, District Staff Development, Grade Level Teams, Department Team Meetings, 2-hour Delay Days

During 2 hour-delay days over a 3 month period, an autism consultant will present to small groups of teachers (30% of the entire staff in each building) on the characteristics of autism spectrum disorders, classroom strategies to implement and social skills development with students with ASD in the school setting.

 

Topic: ROLE OF PARAEDUCATOR/HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHER: Students with disabilities will be provided services by an adequate supply of personnel with the knowledge and skills necessary to meet their needs

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Spring 2009., Spring 2010, Spring 2011

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Higher Education Staff, Teleconferences, webinars, consultants from outside agencies organizations

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Workshops with Joint Planning Periods, Conferences, Distance Learning, District Staff Development, Grade Level Teams, Department Team Meetings, 2-hour Delay Days

Currently, all of the South Fayette teachers and paraeducators are considered highly qualified. However,in the future due to growth in the district or extenuating circumstances students in the district will be educated by 98% of high qualified teachers and paraprofessionals according to NCLB and the Pennsylvania State Standards. The 2% that would be considered not high qualifed would be situations in the future where they are pursuing high qualified status through the Praxis tests to fulfill the requirements of a position.

Personnel Development - PA NCLB Goal #5

Reflections

There are currently no reflections selected for this section.

Base Line Data

South Fayette School District from PDE's Special Education Data Report for the 2005-2006 indicate that our district had at that time 0% Dropout Rate  with a 100% Graduation Rate compared to the state's Dropout Rate which was 7.4% and the state's Graduation Rate was 91.8%.  Therefore, South Fayette has met the state's performance plan indicator for students graduating high school.  We do not currently have our 2006-2007 or our 2007-2008 data to reflect if there is currently a discrepancy that exists between South Fayette School District and the overall state's percentages for dropout and graduation rates.

Personnel Development Activities

Topic: TRANSITION: Students with disabilities will demonstrate increased ability to successfully make the transitions to school age programs, to work, to post-secondary education and/or adult

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Spring 2009, Spring 2010, Spring 2011

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Teleconferences, webinars, consultants from outside agencies organizations

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Conferences, Distance Learning, District Staff Development, Grade Level Teams, Department Team Meetings, 2-hour Delay Days

The South Fayette School District in an attempt to remain proactive in having our special education students graduate from high school with a 0%-7.4% dropout rate and a 100%-91.8% graduation rate will continue to provide professional development to all staff and administration regarding transitions services for students with special needs. For 2005-2006, the district had a 0% dropout rate and the state's dropout rate was 7.4% and South Fayette's graduation rate was 100% compared to the state's graduation rate of 91.8%. The district ensures through the IEP Teams at the secondary level that our students secure employment or some form of post-secondary education beyond graduation. The guidance counselors, transition coordinator, school psychologist and the director of pupil personnel will continue to be updated on Transition Indicators 13 and 14.

Behavior Support Services

Reflections

There are currently no reflections selected for this section.

Summarized School District Policy

Positive Behavior Support is mandated by 14.133 of IDEA '97 and IDEIA 2006 regulations.  The Pennsylvania Department of Education refers to this requirements as "Positive Behavior Support".  At the beginning of every school year, the director of pupil personnel reviews with the entire staff of South Fayette School District "Confidentiality and Positive Behavior Support" such as Functional Behavior Assessments, Positive Behavior Intervention Plans and utilizing research-based effective classroom management strategies.

The district has 5 guidance counselors, 1 school psychologist, 2 AIU contracted social workers for 3 days per week, 2 days a week of a FamilyLinks Coordinator who does individual counseling, Turtle Creek D/A Representative 1x a week,  middle and high schools have SAP Teams and the elementary school has a Chhild Study Team to support students with academic, social, emotional and behavioral issues as well as D/A. 

The following is a summation of disciplinary incidents of our special education students from the 2007-2008 school year thus far as of April 30, 2008 that have ocurred to date in the South Fayette School District:

Elementary:
0 Discipline Incidences for Students with Special Needs
0 Suspensions of Students with Special Needs

Middle School:
21 Discipline Incidents for Students with Special Needs
3 Suspensions of Students with Special Needs

High School:
19 Discipline Incidences for Students with Special Needs
15 Suspensions of Students with Special Needs

We currently have 10 Positive Behavior Intervention Plans for students with IEPs at the South Fayette School District with special needs in grades K-12.

Please find below the South Fayette School District's Board Policy on "Behavior Management for Exceptional Children".  However, the following is our summation of our "Psychological Counseling Intervention Levels" that provides a comprehensive continum of supports to meet the needs of all students, from requiring minimal intervetions through those with highly intensive and complex behavior support requirements:

South Fayette School District

Consideration of IEP Team for Providing

Psychological Counseling Intervention

LEVEL 1 INTERVENTION

-School-wide Behavior Support — designed to serve all students and parents involving school wide prevention, early intervention, and intensive services to students with significant emotional and/or behavioral needs.  Students follow the Code of Conduct listed in the school handbook and discipline is handled through the deans.

LEVEL 2 INTERVENTION

-Classroom Positive Behavior Management System — involves the establishment of a set of rules, rewards, and consequences within the classroom.  These procedures can be implemented daily by a teacher, personal care assistant, or educational assistant.  Rules should be clear and consequences should be consistent.  Teacher must have established positive behavior supports for the student.

LEVEL 3 INTERVENTION

-Individual Behavior Support Plan — includes a variety of techniques to develop and maintain skills that will enhance an individual students’ or young child’s opportunity for learning and self-fulfillment.  The types of intervention chosen for a particular student or young child shall be the least intrusive necessary.  These procedures can be implemented daily by all personnel involved with the student.  The following should be considered prior to developing an Individual Behavior Support Plan:

         Does the student need to learn and/or use new behaviors, skills, and/or strategies?

         Does the student demonstrate behaviors that are unsafe and/or that significantly interfere with the learning environment?

         Is the student routinely removed from the general education classroom because of inappropriate behavior?

         Is the student’s behavior related to, or a manifestation of, a disability?

A functional behavior assessment should be conducted by the school counselor and/or school social worker.  Using this data, the SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER needs to develop a behavioral support plan.  An IEP meeting should be convened and the support plan should be added to the IEP.  Counseling support by the guidance counselors should continue through this process.  Dr. Sullivan may request more intensive counseling services through the district’s social worker.  A parent must sign permission for the social worker to counsel their child individually.  Mrs. Tucci should be contacted to become involved in the process to begin gathering data for a reevaluation.

LEVEL 4 INTERVENTION

-Individual Counseling Support from Guidance Counselor - The IEP team should be convened to discuss the child’s progress and, if necessary regular school-based counseling support services should be added to the related services section of the IEP.  This should be discussed with Dr. Sullivan prior to convening the IEP meeting.  The team may also wish to provide parents a list of outside agencies that can provide in home support and in school support (wrap-around) at this point.

LEVEL 5 INTERVENTION

-Reconvene IEP to Consider Alternative Placement — Data compiled by the team NEEDS to indicate that none of the level 1 through 4 interventions are working and that the child is in need of a more supportive placement.

 

South Fayette Township

 

School District

 

             POLICY NO.    113-A     
Section                        PUPILS    
Title                  Behavior Management for Exceptional Children
Date Adopted                     August 17, 1993     Revised                           September 26, 2000 Revised                           December 5, 2005   

 

 

 

 

GUIDE

 

REFERENCE

 

 

 

 

I.  Purpose

Title 22

Sec. 14.133

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.  Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN 

A behavior management plan, in the context of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), is a special education service for eligible students whose behavior problem(s) interfere with learning.  The regulations and standards indicate that positive approaches/interventions that are less intrusive than regular disciplinary options/procedures should be attempted in order to maintain and support the dignity of the individual.

 

Any eligible special education student who exhibits behavior problems which interfere with the student’s ability to learn must have a program of behavior management.  The behavior management plan will be included in the IEP and shall:

A.      Focus on positive rather than negative measures.

B.      Use interventions that are the least intrusive necessary.

C.      Not substitute aversive techniques, restraints or discipline for the systematic application of behavior change techniques.

D.      Only use techniques for which the staff has been adequately trained.

SECTION A — INTERVENTION LEVELS

The South Fayette Township School District’s Behavior Management Plan for exceptional students consists of four levels, based upon best practices and current professional research.  The four levels of intervention are:

Level I: Discipline Policy

The District has a board approved Student Rights and Responsibilities Policy.  This policy should be reviewed whenever interventions are considered.  (Note: Special Education Standards and Regulations must be considered along with the current case law.)

 

Level II: Classroom Behavior Management Strategies

Traditional classroom management has been associated with “discipline”, “control”, or other terms that connote reducing or eliminating student behavior problem(s).  In this view, classroom management has been narrowly defined as something that needs to happen before teachers can teach their students effectively or something that needs to happen when students are disruptive so that teachers may continue teaching their students.  

Effective classroom management is a rather complicated matter which is impacted by a variety of different things, including student, teacher, and environmental factors.  Classroom behavior management and instruction are interwoven processes.  Effective instructional practices are likely to decrease student disruptions and impact positive behavioral responses, while effective behavior management strategies are likely to positively impact instructional outcomes.  Successful classroom management involves preventing problems from occurring by creating environments that encourage learning and appropriate behavior, as well as, responding effectively when behavior problem(s) do occur.  Additionally, the long range goal of classroom behavior management should be for all students to learn to manage their own behaviors.  Effective classroom management must involve proactive classroom strategies, behavioral interventions to be used when problems arise, and continued emphasis on student learning to manage their own behaviors.  Without proactive classroom management methods, as well as an emphasis on student self-management, behavior change interventions will have limited long term effectiveness.

Strategies emphasized may include 

Pro-active Classroom Management

         Effective Teaching Practices

         Frequent Monitoring/Feedback

         Clear Rules and Procedures

         Effective Classroom Schedules

         Use of Appropriate Activities/Materials

         Social Praise

         Environmental Cues

         Curriculum Adaptations

         Direct Instruction

         Naturalistic Teaching Strategies

         Task Analysis

         Instruction in Self-Monitoring

Pro-social Behavior

         Systematic Reinforcement

         Modeling Pro-social Behavior

         Verbal Instruction

         Role Playing

         Cueing

Social Problem Solving                                      

         Discussions of Real Life Dilemmas

         Role Playing

         Student Participation in Decision-making

         Activities

         Alternative Thinking

         Social Skills Instructions

Affective Strategies and Communication

         Active Listening

         Communication Skills Training

Use of Assistive Devices                    

         Allow Students to express themselves through augmentative devices

         Functional Communication Training

Level III: Moderately Intrusive Behavior Management

The primary goal of effective behavior management or behavior support is to produce long lasting behavior change by teaching alternative skills and building supportive environments.  Some student(s) whose behavior interfere(s) with learning may respond well to typical classroom behavior management strategies.  However, other students may require more intensive behavior management or behavior support.  The Pennsylvania Department of Education’s Guidelines for Effective Behavior Support (1995) provides a framework for designing and implementing effective behavior support for students whose behavior interferes with learning and who do not respond satisfactorily to typical behavior management strategies outlined in Level II.

Effective behavior support is based upon four main assumptions:

1)                   Challenging behaviors serve as a function for the students

2)                   Challenging behaviors are context related

3)                   Effective interventions are based on a thorough understanding of the problem behavior

4)                   Behavior support plans should be guided by two values: all students with disabilities should be treated with the same dignity and respect as their peers without disabilities and all students with disabilities have the right to be included in integrated activities.

This behavior management policy will not attempt to list the individual procedures that may be appropriate for specific problems.  Given the diverse characteristics of students and of the learning environment, the same behavior intervention may be effective for one student and not the other student that exhibits the same behavioral difficulty.  Additionally, the goal of effective behavior support is not to develop a listing of behavioral techniques which should be uniformly applied to all students, but rather to develop a comprehensive set of interventions that meets the unique needs of specific individuals and results in long lasting behavioral change.

The following guidelines should be followed when creating and implementing behavioral supports:

Step 1: Conduct a Functional Assessment of the Behavior

During the functional assessment, the team should strive to understand the student and the nature of the student’s problem behavior(s) in relation to the student’s environment.  Three outcomes should be accomplished: (1) predict the times and circumstances under which the behavior is likely to occur, (2) identify the purpose of  the behavior, and (3) identify the student variables and lifestyle factors that may influence the behavior(s).  During the functional assessment, teams should gather broad, then specific information about the student, behavior(s), and environment.  Initially, the behavior must be operationally defined and the social significance for

changing the behavior should be specified.  The team should use interviews, rating scales, team discussions, and review student records to gather broad information.  Specific information should be gathered through the ABC Scatterplot or the Functional Analysis Scale.  The information gathering process should lead to the identification of the events surrounding the behavior’s occurrence.

Step 2: Develop Hypothesis Statements

 After the functional assessment is completed, the team should summarize and synthesize all of the information in order to develop hypothesis statements about the problem behavior(s).  Specific and global hypothesis statement should be generated.  A specific hypothesis statement should describe antecedent or setting events, identify the problem behavior(s) and describe the behavior(s) function(s).  A global hypothesis statement should identify student variable and lifestyle variables that may contribute to the problem behavior(s).  Global hypotheses lead to modifications that could be made for long term prevention while specific hypotheses lead to antecedent/setting events that could be modified and alternative skills that could be taught.

Step 3: Design an Effective Behavioral Support Plan

Behavior support plans contain (a) description or the problem behavior(s) and why they are important to change, (b) hypotheses regarding the problem behavior(s), (c) intervention strategies, (d) supports for team members, and (e) evaluation procedures.  Intervention strategies are directly linked to the hypotheses and fall into four main areas: antecedent/setting event strategies, alternative skills training, consequence strategies, and long-term prevention.  When designating and implementing behavioral support plans, teams should remember that each plan is highly individualized and may vary over time.  Not every child will require the same number and intensity of interventions across the four categories.  Likewise, as the child develops more skills, he/she may not require interventions in one or more of the four categories.

Step 4: Evaluate Effectiveness

When evaluating the effectiveness of the support plan, teams should answer three key questions:

(a)                 Was there a reduction in the problem behavior(s)?

(b)                 Was there an increase in alternative skills?

(c)                 Did meaningful outcomes result for the student?

Effectiveness of the support plan should be documented in a number of ways, including recording and graphing frequency of the problem behavior(s) and/or alternative skills, recording the students’ activities, using progress notes, noting changes in grades, and summarizing behavioral and/or academic reports.

Step 5: Modify the Support Plan as Needed

After evaluating the support plan’s effectiveness, teams should identify whether further assessment is needed, whether they should modify specific components, or whether or not the plan should address new goals.  The behavior support plan is meant to be an “evolving” or “on-going” document.  As part of the IEP, the behavior support plan should be reviewed at least annually or more often depending upon the student’s needs.

Strategies emphasized may include:

         Prompting/Cueing

         Redirection

         Time-out within the classroom

         Behavior Contracting

         Scheduled/Unscheduled Reinforcement

         Use of logical consequences

         Environmental Restructuring

         Manipulation or Antecedents and

         Consequences

         Self-monitoring

         Emphasis on Generalization and Maintenance of Skills

         Classroom Meetings

         Social Problem-Solving

         Behavior Contracting

         Time-out

         Modeling and Rehearsal

         Coaching

         Self-Instruction

Level IV: Significantly Intrusive Behavior Management Techniques

These interventions are formal behavior programs which are restrictive in nature and may modify the student’s rights during implementation.  They specifically focus on restraining strategies and are considered more intrusive to personal freedom than any Level I, II, or III interventions. 

The Interventions for Level IV may include the following:

1. Physical Restraint: Physical containment of a student by direct contact for the purpose of restricting and inappropriate behavior.  The behavior must be one that presents a danger to self or others.  The student must remain calm for a specified time in order to be released from the restraint.

2.  Mechanical Restraint: Used to control involuntary movement or lack of muscular control of students when due to organic causes or conditions, may be employed only when specified by an IEP and as determined by a medical professional qualified to make the determination and as agreed to by the student’s parents.  Mechanical restraints shall only be used to prevent a student from injuring himself or others or shall promote normative body positioning and physical functioning.

3. Exclusionary Time-Out: Used to extinguish external stimuli so that student may regain emotional composure.

Procedures for Developing and Implementing Level IV Interventions

1.These interventions must be specifically based on a Multidisciplinary Team’s recommendation to the IEP Team.  The MDT must offer a compelling argument that presents (a) less restrictive measures were unsuccessful, (b) behavior is dangerous or self, other students and/or employees, (c) alternative placement has been ruled out, and (d) the program is therapeutically justified.

2.The IEP Team must be convened to specifically discuss a Level 4 intervention as recommended by the MDT.  The IEP Team should ascertain the use of restraints and conclude that they are NOT:

a.                   Employed as punishment

b.                   For the convenience of staff

c.                    A substitute for an educational program

3. All Level IV interventions must be agreed to by the student’s parents/legal guardians.  In addition, the LEA will assure that staff is trained in the use of these specific procedures, methods, and techniques.

SECTION B — OTHER CONSIDERATIONs 

A.            Prohibitive Adverse Techniques (Forbidden By State Regulations and Standards)

The following adverse techniques of handling behavior are considered inappropriate and MAY NOT be used by agencies in education programs:

1.                   Corporal punishment

2.                   Punishment for a manifestation of a student’s disability

3.                   Locked rooms, locked boxes, or other locked structures or spaces from which the students cannot readily exit

4.                   Noxious substances

5.                   Deprivation of basic human rights, such as withholding meals, water or fresh air

6.                   Suspensions constituting a pattern under 22 Pa. Code 14.143(a)

7.                   Treatment of a demeaning nature

8.                   Electric shock

9.                   Methods implemented by untrained personnel

10.                Methods which have not been outlined in the agency’s plan

B.            Emergency Procedures

 Emergency procedures for behavior that presents a clear and present danger to the student or others may be delineated on the IEP.  These emergency procedures may include such activities as:

1.                   Parent contact to immediately remove the student from school.

2.                   Notifying the police.

3.                   Notifying mental health.

4.                   Calling emergency services and ambulance.

5.                   Nonviolent therapeutic physical crisis intervention by trained staff which may include Level IV techniques.

If a student’s behavior is considered to be life threatening in nature, the classroom teacher will immediately take appropriate action to protect all individuals involved, followed by documentation after the incident.  The parent will be notified of the incident as soon as possible by the school personnel.  A meeting must be convened with parent, representatives of the education agency and other appropriate agencies prior to the student returning to the classroom.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 7 of 7

 

 

Personnel Development Activities

Topic: Positive Behavioral Supports

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

April 21, 2008 and Fall 2009 and Fall 2010

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, District Administration or Staff, Private Consultation Agencies, Podcasts and teleconferences

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Workshops with Joint Planning Periods, Conferences, Study Groups, Distance Learning, District Staff Development, Grade Level Teams, Department Team Meetings, 2-hour Delay Days

The elementary school needs to maintain current statistics of 0 discipline referrals and 0 suspensions for students with special needs.

The middle school for 2007-2008 had 21 referrals for discipline and 3 suspensions of students with special needs. The middle school through training of their staff on positive behavioral supports will decrease the number of referrals of students with special needs by 10% for 2008-2009, 10% for 2009-2010 and 10% for 2010-2011 and the decrease in discipline referrals will impact the number of suspensions.

The high school for 2007-2008 had 19 referrals of students with special needs with 15 suspensions. The high school staff through training in positive behavioral supports will decrease the number of discipline referrals of students with special needs by 10% for 2008-2009, 10% for 2009-2010 and 10% for 2010-2011 and the decrease of discipline referrals will impact a decrease in the number of suspensions.

 

Topic: School-based Behavioral Health

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Winter 2009, Winter 2010 and Winter 2011

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Higher Education Staff, Teleconferences, webinars, consultants from outside agencies organizations

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Workshops with Joint Planning Periods, Conferences, Distance Learning, District Staff Development, Grade Level Teams, Department Team Meetings, 2-hour Delay Days

Currently, in the spring of 2008 South Fayette School District has a total student population of 2,192 students and the number of students in approved private and private placements outside of the school distirct due to behavioral and emotional issues is 8 students.

The school district will provide individual professional development based on need for staff who are working with students with serious emotional disturbance in the area of coping strategies, problem-solving skills, behavior monitoring/self-regulation, impulse control and emotional regulation. The district will decrease the number of outside placements due to behavioral and emotional issues for students who are identified as serious emotional disturbance by 13% (approximately 1 student per year) for 2008-2009, 13% decrease (approximately 1 student per year) for 2009-2010 and 13% decrease (approximately 1 student per year) for 2010-2011.

 

Topic: De-escalation Techniques

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Fall 2009, Fall 2010, and Fall 2011

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Higher Education Staff, Teleconferences, webinars, consultants from outside agencies and organizations

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Workshops with Joint Planning Periods, Conferences, Distance Learning, District Staff Development, Grade Level Teams, Department Team Meetings, 2-hour Delay Days

The South Fayette School District will provide district wide training to selected staff and administration based on needs of individual students on how to de-escalate students with serious emotional disturbance in an effort to maintain these students with this type of disablity in the regular school setting or special education setting.

The South Fayette School District will provide training on de-escalation techniques in an effort to include students in the district setting and reduce the number of children with emotional and behavioral disorders that have been placed outside of the district by a decrease of 13% (approximately 1 student per year) for 2008-2009, decrease by 13% (approximately 1 student per year) for 2009-2010 and 13% (approximately 1 student per year) for 2010-2011.

Interagency Collaboration (11 P.S. §875.304)

Ensuring FAPE/Hard to Place Students

When the South Fayette School District suspects may be at risk of not having his/her IEP implemented, the school district will contact the local intermediate unit interagency coordinator.  This individual will assist the district with arranging interagency meeting through the local CASSP office which will include all of the agencies that provide support to the student.  The IEP team members will meet to review the IEP to determine the students needs are being met and to make any necessary changes.  In the event that the placement cannot be secured and the IEP cannot be implemented, the district will report the required information using the appropriate form to the PA Department of Education.  The school district will update information monthly as needed.  Additionally the district will report to the PA Department of Education all students with disabilities who are on homebound instruction or instruction conducted in the home on the appropriate form. 

The South Fayette School District utilizes a team approach in order to determine an appropriate educational placement (for the hard to place) students with disabilities.  District IEP teams collaborate with the local community mental health base service units such as the Chartiers MH/MR, FamilyLinks, Staunton Clinic, Turtle Creek, Inter-care Behavioral Health, Southwood Psychiatric Hospital, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Gateway Drug and Alcohol Treatment Center and Mercy Behavioral.

If a student is involved with MH/MR system, the South Fayette School District initiates contact after the parental consent has been secured to communicate with the respective behavioral health agency.  At that point, the MH/MR support coordinator meets with the student's team of teachers to discuss what services are needed.

Local Continuum of Supports and Services

(A) Our district recently has developed administrative procedures and forms to process any outside agencies (wraparound supports/TSS/BSC/MT) who provide support of our students in the public school setting who has special needs.  This is to ensure that they share information with the district, follow district policies and procedures, understand confidentiality in the public school setting and have the appropriate clearances/credentials to be present and support students in various classroom settings.  The district works collaboratively with outside mental health agencies to provide consistency and continuity in educational programming.  We have Office of Vocational Rehabilitation, Chartiers MH/MR, Staunton Clinc, FamilyLinks, Family Behavioral Resources, Wesley Spectrum Services, Southwood Psychiatric Hospital, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinc and Turtle Creek.  If necessary, the district will coordinate an interagency team meeting through the Allegheny Intermediate Unit#3 to ensure FAPE is provided to the students. 

The district also provides when necessary an alternative educational program for students who need a highly structured learning environment with a therapeutic environment.  South Fayette School District utilizes the following alternative education placements for students who are in need of a program with an intense therapeutic component which include the following:  Pressley-Ridge Schools, Wesley-Spectrum Highlands, Wesley Spectrum Academy, Holy Family Learning Institute, Watson Institute, Children's Institute, Pathfinder School, Western Pennsylvania School for the Blind, Western Pennsylvania for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing and Easter Seals Programs.  We also have minimal students placed in cross-district placements in neighboring school districts to deliver FAPE in order to address various disabilities.

The district utilizes the Allegheny Intermediate Unit #3 for many related services in supporting our students such as the following: occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech and language services, assistive technology, social worker services, psychological services, orientation and mobility, vision support, hearing support and early intervention/transition to school-aged programs.  We are also part of the Allegheny County Intermediate Consortium which provides extended school year, social worker services, occupational therapy, physical therapy and psychological services.

The Watson Institute provides school and community-based programs to our students with moderate to severe disabilities.  They provide on the job training, shadowing experiences, training to complete job applications, provide job coaches on the job sites and representatives serve as liaisons between Watson Institute, South Fayette School District and local businesses.

South Fayette School District also contracts and works with Inter-Care for all psychiatric evaluations for students.  Dr. Stephen Lee is the district's contracted psychiatist from Inter-Care who diagnoses DSM-IV disorders for students who are found to be under the exceptionality of serious emotional disturbance.  He meets with students and parents as well as confers with the school district when evaluating students.  He also has been on conference call when required by the district to communicate with parents during an MDT meeting.

(B) The South Fayette School District has an intensive and comprehensive staff interview process to recruit new staff or to replace staff if necessary.  The school district also has a comprehensive 5-day New Teacher Induction Program for all new staff at the beginning of each school year.  The South Fayette School District offers employees a competitive salary with benefits that supports the district in recruiting and retaining quality staff.   The school also provides 3-days of staff development for both new and veteran staff on targeted topical areas that impact student performance, special education law and regulations, research-evidence based strategies, review and discussion of PSSA data results, grade level team meetings or department team meetings, pre-referral screening processes, understanding various disabilities and mental health diagnoses, trainings on related services that are available to students in the regular classroom settings and paraeducator training based on specific needs of students. All of the district's paraeducators and special education teachers are highly qualified under NCLB.  Our paraeducators are also required to complete the PDE "Credential of Competency of Special Education for Paraeducators".  The district also provides support for our new teachers through our mentor teacher program where a veteran teacher is assigned to a new teacher for one year.   They attend meetings throughout the year on various topics with their mentors and new teachers with the assistant superintendent.  This ensures our new staff receives ongoing support throughout their first year of teaching.

Expansion of Continuum of Supports and Services


Our district recently has developed administrative procedures and forms to process any outside agencies (wraparound supports/TSS/BSC/MT) who provide support of our students in the public school setting who has special needs.  This is to ensure that they share information with the district, follow district policies and procedures, understand confidentiality in the public school setting and have the appropriate clearences/credentials to be present and support students in various classroom settings.  The district works collaboratively with outside mental health agencies to provide consistency and continuity in educational programming.  We have Office of Vocational Rehabilitation, Chartiers MH/MR, Staunton Clinc, FamilyLinks, Family Behavioral Resources, Wesley Spectrum Services, Southwood Psychiatric Hospital, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinc and Turtle Creek.  If necessary, the district will coordinate an interagency team meeting through the Allegheny Intermediate Unit#3 to ensure FAPE is provided to the students. 

The district also provides when necessary an alternative educational program for students who need a highly structured learning environment with a therapeutic environment.  South Fayette School District utilizes the following alternative education placements for students who are in need of a program with an intense therapeutic component which include the following:  Pressley-Ridge Schools, Wesley-Spectrum Highlands, Wesley Spectrum Academy, Holy Family Learning Institute, Watson Institute, Children's Institute, Pathfinder School, Western Pennsylvania School for the Blind, Western Pennsylvania for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing and Easter Seals Programs.  We also have minimal students placed in cross-district placements in neighboring school districts to deliver FAPE in order to address various disabilities.

The district utilizes the Allegheny Intermediate Unit #3 for many related services in supporting our students such as the following: occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech and language services, assistive technology, social worker services, psychological services, orientation and mobility, vision support, hearing support and early intervention/transition to school-aged programs.

The Watson Institute provides school and community-based programs to our students with moderate to severe disabilities.  They provide on the job training, shadowing experiences, training to complete job applications, provide job coaches on the job sites and representatives serve as liaisons between Watson Institute, South Fayette School District and local businesses.

South Fayette School District also utilizes Watson Institute in having an autism spectrum disorder consultant who comes to the district twice a month.  The consultant observes students in regular education classrooms settings in grades K-12, writes a report on each observation and makes recommendations to the teachers, guidance counselors and the Director of Pupil Personnel.  The consultant also provides training to special education teachers, regular education teachers and paraeducators on the TEACCH method, making work bins, participant in IEP/BIP meetings, collecting data from functional behavioral assessments and behavior intervention plans.  By having an ASD consultant, the district is able to support many students with ASD in the least restrictive setting.

FamilyLinks provides the South Fayette School District and its students the following services:

Promoting Alternative Thinking StrategiesPATHS is a comprehensive program for promoting emotional and social competencies and reducing aggression and behavior problems in elementary school-aged children while simultaneously enhancing the educational process. PATHS designed an innovative curriculum to be used by both educators and counselors. This curriculum incorporates life skills training by teaching students to build emotional literacy, self control, social skills, positive peer relationships and interpersonal problem solving skills. It has improved self control, understanding and recognition of emotions, increased ability to tolerate frustration and use of more effect conflict-resolution.  This is utilized as early intervention for the 30 full day kindergartners.  FamilyLinks provides 120 hours to the district in this area.

For the thirty-nine (39) middle school students, a total of 60 hours, programming focuses on:  1)  Moving On:  This topic covers a variety of areas to assist students in preparing for the transition from middle school to high school to the transition from elementary school to middle school.  Emphasis is placed on peer pressure, coping skills, ATOD prevention, time management.  2) Team Building:  The purpose of this curriculum is to teach students the values that support being part of a team.  These values emphasize effective communication, listening for a purpose, differentiation between competition and cooperation, decision making and inclusion/exclusion. And 3) Social Skills: Modified from the PATHS curriculum, this curriculum incorporates life skills training by teaching students to build emotional literacy, self control, social skills, positive peer relationships and interpersonal problem solving skills.

Program Profile

ID

OPR

Location / Building Name

Bldg Grade

Bldg Type

Type of Support

Type of Service

Low Age

High Age

Case load

Tchr FTE

-

SD

South Fayette Elementary

E

GE

S

LS

6

10

10

1.0

-

SD

South Fayette Elementary

E

GE

S

LSS

5

10

7

1.0

-

SD

South Fayette Middle

M

GE

S

LS

12

15

12

1.0

-

SD

South Fayette Middle

M

GE

S

LS

10

13

11

1.0

-

SD

South Fayette Middle

M

GE

S

LS

11

13

13

1.0

-

SD

South Fayette Middle

M

GE

I

LS

10

14

12

1.0

-

SD

South Fayette High

S

GE

S

LS

15

20

11

1.0

-

SD

South Fayette High

S

GE

S

LS

14

17

19

1.0

-

SD

South Fayette High

S

GE

S

LS

16

19

18

1.0

-

SD

South Fayette High

S

GE

S

LS

15

18

17

1.0

-

SD

South Fayette Elementary

E

GE

I

SLS

5

10

36

1.0

-

IU

South Fayette Elementary

E

GE

I

DHIS

5

10

2

.04

-

IU

South Fayette Middle Schools

M

GE

I

BVIS

10

13

1

.12


Justification: Resource Learning Support classroom at the Elementary: The reason there is a 4 yr. age span from 6-10 years old instead of a 3 yr. age span is because this Learning Support classroom goes from K-4. The classroom is K-4 since we have minimual students for this classroom due to inclusion within the 3 yr. age span. In order to keep the classroom, the district determined that we would need to make the classroom K-4 so that the classroom could be maintained at the Elementary School. All of the students' IEPs document this age difference for the parents and the NOREP outlines this age difference as well. Often times the older students are not in this classroom at the same time as the very young students. The district was very careful when scheduling students into the Learning Support classroom.

Part-time Life Skills classroom at the Elementary: The reason there is a 5 yr. age span from 5-10 years old instead of a 3 yr. age span is because this Life Skills classroom goes from K-4. The classroom is K-4 since we have minimual students for this classroom due to inclusion within the 3 yr. age span. In order to keep the classroom, the district determined that we would need to make the classroom K-4 so that the classroom could be maintained at the Elementary School. All of the students' IEPs document this age difference for the parents and the NOREP outlines this age difference as well. Often times the older students are not in this classroom at the same time as the very young students. The district was very careful when scheduling students into the Life Skills classroom.

Part-time Learning Support High School: The reason there is a 5 yr. age span from 15-20 years old instead of a 4 yr. age span is because this Learning Support classroom goes from grades 9-12. The classroom is Grades 9-12 since we have minimual students for this classroom due to inclusion within the 4 yr. age span. In order to keep the classroom, the district determined that we would need to make the classroom grades 9-12 so that the classroom could be maintained at the High School. All of the students' IEPs document this age difference for the parents and the NOREP outlines this age difference as well. There are Life Skills students being supported in this Learning Support classroom and that is why you are seeing age differences that are possible from ages 14-21. The district attempts to be very careful when scheduling students into this Learning Support classroom.

Support Staff (District)

School District: South Fayette Township SD

ID

OPR

Title

Location

FTE

-

SD

Paraprofessional

South Fayette Elementary School

1.00

-

SD

Paraprofessional

South Fayette Elementary School

1.00

-

SD

Paraprofessional

South Fayette Elementary School

1.00

-

SD

Paraprofessional

South Fayette Elementary School

1.00

-

SD

Paraprofessional

South Fayette Elementary School

1.00

-

SD

Paraprofessional

South Fayette Middle School

1.00

-

SD

Paraprofessional

South Fayette Middle School

1.00

-

SD

Paraprofessional

South Fayette Middle School

1.00

-

SD

Paraprofessional

South Fayette Middle School

1.00

-

SD

Paraprofessional

South Fayette Middle School

1.00

-

C

Paraprofessional

South Fayette Middle School

1.00

-

C

Paraprofessional

South Fayette Middle School

1.00

-

C

Paraprofessional

South Fayette High School

1.00

-

C

Paraprofessional

South Fayette High School

1.00

-

C

Paraprofessional

South Fayette High School

1.00

-

C

Paraprofessional

South Fayette High School

1.00

-

C

Paraprofessional

South Fayette High School

1.00

-

C

Paraprofessional

South Fayette High School

1.00

-

C

Paraprofessional

South Fayette High School

1.00

-

C

Paraprofessional

South Fayette High School

1.00

-

C

Paraprofessional

South Fayette High School

1.00

Contracted Support Services

ID

IU / Agency

Title / Service

Amount of Time per Week

-

IU

School Psychologist

7 Hours

-

IU

Social Worker

12 Hours

-

IU

Educator Interpreter

38 Hours

-

IU

Hearing Support Teacher

1 Hours

-

IU

Occupational Therapy

26 Hours

-

IU

Physical Therapy

3 Hours

-

IU

Speech & Language Clinician

21 Hours

-

Watson Institute

Autism Consultant

4 Hours

-

Watson Institute

Community Based Consultant

8 Hours

-

Watson Institute

Community Based Specialist

12 Hours

-

Family Links

School & Community Based Prevention Coordinator

12 Hours

-

IU

Vision Support Teacher

3 Hours


Assurance for the Operation of Special Education Services and Programs

School Years: 2008 - 2011

The South Fayette Township SD within Allegheny IU 3 assures that the school district will comply with the requirements of 22 Pa. Code Chapter 14 and with the policies and procedures of PDE. PDE will specify, in writing, policies and procedures to be followed. Requests for any deviations from these regulations, standards, policies, and procedures must be made in writing to PDE. The school district understands that special education reports will be approved by PDE in accordance with the following criteria as set forth in 22 Pa. School Code § 14.104:

  1. There are a full range of services, programs and alternative placements available to the school district for placement and implementation of the special education programs in the school district.
  2. The school district has adopted a child find system to locate, identify and evaluate young children and children who are thought to be a child with a disability eligible for special education residing within the school district"s jurisdiction. Child find data is collected, maintained, and used in decision-making. Child find process and procedures are evaluated for its effectiveness. The school district implements mechanisms to disseminate child find information to the public, organizations, agencies, and individuals on at least an annual basis.
  3. The school district has adopted policies and procedures that assure that students with disabilities are included in general education programs and extracurricular and non-academic programs and activities to the maximum extent appropriate in accordance with an Individualized Education Program.
  4. The school district will comply with the PA Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education"s report revision notice process.
  5. The school district follows the state and federal guidelines for participation of students with disabilities in state and district-wide assessments including the determination of participation, the need for accommodations, and the methods of assessing students for whom regular assessment is not appropriate.
  6. The school district assures the Pennsylvania Department of Education that funds received through participation in the medical assistance reimbursement program, ACCESS, will be used to enhance or expand the current level of services and programs provided to students with disabilities in this local education agency.

This assurance must be signed by the School Board President and the Superintendent for the school district to operate services and programs.


_________________________ __________     _________________________ __________
Board President                       Date                 Superintendent                         Date